Discover rusyns people


Your Face is a Barcode

Themes  from  this  article:reduction in the time necessary to complete
inconsequential tasks (moving paper around)
A digital image of a person's face, can beallows more effective use of the staff
matched against a database of otherresources.However most law enforcement
images.The potential will exist to track thetechnologies, including standard CCTV
movements of everyone in a country.Automaticsecurity cameras are only effective with the
face recognition is now becomingcooperation of the people, these systems are
practical.Face recognition systems in publicoften useless against those with criminal
places, is a matter for serious concen.Theintent, and this technology does not generate
shock value of the horrific events onirrefutable evidence in adverse conditions,
September 11 could make many people opposedsuch as those that exist in many airports,
to excessive security much more tolerant ofwhich would increase the risk of false
its implementation.Information is collectedidentifications. The problem is that false
and transferred without Knolouge oridentification by a person does not involve
permission from the subjects.Abuse of facethe implied reputation of technological
recognition may generate additionalaccuracy.Freedom of actions:Absolute freedom
crimes.The question is that of proportion,would require the absence of any controls,
there must be a balance between liberty andlegal of otherwise, this would amount to
control.anarchy. Thus despite being free to do as we
peace, we would, ironically, not have the
Points  inferred  indirectly:ability to act upon our pleasure, as our
lives would be consumed with the nauseate of
And everywhere the ceremony of innocence issaying alive! This is in direct contrast with
drowned the best lack all conviction whilewhat we are able to accomplish with in the
the worst are full of passionaterestrictions of society, as a result of the
intensity.Technology is intrinsicallyopportunities such restriction
neutral, how it is used determines if it is acreates.Implications:The implications of
force for good or evil.The central principleexpediency adopting such systems are numerous
of our culture should be that which makesfighting terrorism notwithstanding, there are
ours a free democratic society.One canmany as yet unresolved questions as to the
extrapolate from historical events such asuses of a system designed to infringe upon
the unclear tests in 1947, that technologiesthe populous without the consent or knowledge
can not be dis-invented or confined to oneof these people whose faces are captured. As
use.Data protection Act may apply, providinglogs  as  there  are  successive  gove
at least some basic rights, (no other
statutory right in English law to personalments, that take control and change
privacy).Technology can make surveillancepolicies, the uses of such tools will also be
cheaper through automation a somecontinually changing.The problems arise when
processes.Freedom is only the perception ofone considers the wider effects that unwanted
being autonomous.A society can only besurveillance may have, fore example democracy
considered free where the goverment forces dois in part based on the principle that groups
not have absolute power over the generalcan develop views in insolation from
populace.Democracy is in part based on thegoverment.One can extrapolate from historical
principles that groups can develop views inevents such as the development of Atomic
insolation  from  goverment.weapons, to save thousands on both sides by
ending the second would war without invading
Summary:The  main points made in an article:Japan The plans for which were stolen be the
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, which
Security system impresses US officials, astarted a sequence of events that untimely
special report on the terrorism crisis byended in the current situation where several
Stuart Millar published in the Guardian onminor nation have the ability to start a
Tuesday September 25 are summarised aschain reaction that would literary destroy
follows:American authorities are committed tothe world.Data protection laws:The American
deploying a relatively new combination ofpeople have built into there laws safeguards
software and surveillance technologies inthat could reasonable be used to help prevent
response to the attacks of September 11th asthe uncontrolled spread of privative systems.
part of an airport security review.The systemWe in direct contrast have no rights built
under consideration, known as FaceIt, isrights to protect the privacy of information
designed to identify known suspects, throughapart from those set into the data protection
comparison of a person's face against alegislation which maybe a futile gesture as
database of facial images, it does notthere are get out glasses for anything evan
require the cooperation of the subject, andremotely related to law enforcement.Innocent
may not even generate irrefutable evidence inMajority:Should this severance technology be
adverse conditions, such as those that existimplemented anywhere, the unique situation
in many airports, which would increase thewill be created where information will be
risk of false identifications.Thiscollected and processed without the
development is being driven by politicalindividual's knowledge and will be used
interests and could be implemented on mass,without the individual having consent. The
to form an equivalent to the British ring ofData protection Act may apply, providing at
steel, supposedly for our safety andleast some basic rights, (no other statutory
protection to help law enforcement trackright in English law to personal privacy
known subjects. But once in place it's useexists).Ethical Dilemmas:In a stable society
will invariably be extended over time tothe freedom of the individual can not be
infringe upon the populous without ourabsolute, there must be a balance between
consent or knowledge.The question is that ofliberty and control. It is conceivable that
proportion there must be a balance betweenthere would be no civilised society without a
liberty and control. It should be noted thatgovement able to curtail liberty to a
the current increase in the number of youthsreasonable degree. The question is that of
waring hoods is possibly a direct result ofproportion technology can be use as a tool
the introduction of CCTV systems.Abstract:Thefor control, however over use of such
populace of an informed society wouldtechnologies implies oppression.Any
generally resist even the proposal of anytechnology can effect a society in
potentially repressive technology such as thesignificant ways. Fore example increasingly
FaceIt facial recognition system, with thetravail bits of data are collected,
capacity to indiscriminately report on thetransferred precessed and used without the
movements of any subject, especially whenindividual's knowledge, this is a situation
these technological developments are beingin which people can be completely manipulated
driven by political interests.However suchby technology and it has long been the case
fears are currently being circumvented by thethat legal decisions lag behind technical
stronger feelings of national insecurity,developments.Conclusions:There is an old
which are also causing fundamentalBuddhist proverb that states "To every man is
adjustments in political reasoning of thegiven the key to the gates of heaven; the
United States authorities whom are bysame key opens the gates of hell". Words of
implication encouraging development ofwisdom and of waing as within computerisation
technologies previously believed to belies such a key.The implication is that
technically and socially unjustifiable.Thenearly everything has some kind of cost to
United States goverment:Is committed toit, new technologies are not created
deploying a derivation of traditionalinstantaneously, so the consequences of such
surveillance technology, in response to anew systems are also not instantaneously
review of airport security in lite of therealised, if we choose to ignore certain
attacks of September 11th, as a measure tocircumstances in fever of expedient action,
help prevent simular incidents in the future.in the end, the full implications will be
This may be a futile gesture as they arerealised, unfortunately too late.As implied
looking at technology to identify knownabove, the events of September 11th are
suspects, the problem is that this is notimportant, these events have almost certainly
very useful as it is the unknown terroristschanged things forever. The question is that
that  the  authorities  need  to  be  conceof proportion, this is what will determine
whether the have won or not. Especially when
ed about.Technology:This is a relatively newthese systems are idolised and become more
combination of software and surveillanceimportant then the humans that they exist to
technologies, the basic components of theserve, we know from history that this
FaceIt system under consideration have beensequence of events inevitably fall back upon
about for years, the system is designed toand destroy its makers in the end. Such
identify known people in public, this couldsubject have as yet been sadly lacking in our
be implemented to form an equivalent to thestudies thus.Technology is intrinsically
British ring of steel and notwithstanding aneutral, how it is used determines if it is a
highly unlikely series of events resulting inforce for good or evil, if a technology
absolute control of this type of technology,offers savings to one segment of society,
invariably it will find other uses. Forsome cost may be exacted ageist another. The
example, marketing research is frequentlyBible will teach us that we are to count the
carried out via the use of surveys. It would!cost of our commitments. Is there a price
be a trivial matter to use such a powerfultag for your soul? Jesus asks the most
security system to generate statistical dataprofound question "What does it profit a man
for analysing consumer trends.This technologyif he gains the whole world but loses his own
may be able to capture and analyse an imagesoul in hell forever" Jesus is asking if we
of your face, identify you from a see ofhave really thought about costs; spiritual
people, read your face and even infer thingsand material. (Jesus said, Matthew 16:26).As
from your body language, but the contextlong as we can justify the cost in terms of
outside the view of the cameras and thehow it allows us it feel safer, then we are
essence of the moment will be lostfree  because  we  believe  the  gove
forever.Effectiveness:The efficiency of any
technology is a function of firstly itsment is curtailing our liberty to allow a
inherent advantages over traditional methodsbetter quality of life. However, if as a
and secondly whether its use would solve moresociety we accept invasive methods of
problems than it would create.Automation ofprotection then we surrender a little more
surveillance operations may reduce part offreedom to choose how to five as we see fit
the administration required, throughand not as other would dictate. This includes
effective communications and more centralisedthe right to life without others watching our
control, than is possible with humanevery move.
surveillance. The implication being that



1 A B 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77