Your Face is a Barcode

Themes from this article:allows more effective use of the staff
A digital image of a person's face, can beresources.However most law enforcement
matched against a database of other images.Thetechnologies, including standard CCTV security
potential will exist to track the movements ofcameras are only effective with the cooperation
everyone in a country.Automatic face recognitionof the people, these systems are often useless
is now becoming practical.Face recognitionagainst those with criminal intent, and this
systems in public places, is a matter for serioustechnology does not generate irrefutable evidence
concen.The shock value of the horrific events onin adverse conditions, such as those that exist in
September 11 could make many people opposedmany airports, which would increase the risk of
to excessive security much more tolerant of itsfalse identifications. The problem is that false
implementation.Information is collected andidentification by a person does not involve the
transferred without Knolouge or permission fromimplied reputation of technological
the subjects.Abuse of face recognition mayaccuracy.Freedom of actions:Absolute freedom
generate additional crimes.The question is that ofwould require the absence of any controls, legal
proportion, there must be a balance betweenof otherwise, this would amount to anarchy. Thus
liberty and control.despite being free to do as we peace, we would,
Points inferred indirectly:ironically, not have the ability to act upon our
And everywhere the ceremony of innocence ispleasure, as our lives would be consumed with the
drowned the best lack all conviction while thenauseate of saying alive! This is in direct contrast
worst are full of passionate intensity.Technology iswith what we are able to accomplish with in the
intrinsically neutral, how it is used determines if it isrestrictions of society, as a result of the
a force for good or evil.The central principle ofopportunities such restriction
our culture should be that which makes ours acreates.Implications:The implications of expediency
free democratic society.One can extrapolate fromadopting such systems are numerous fighting
historical events such as the unclear tests in 1947,terrorism notwithstanding, there are many as yet
that technologies can not be dis-invented orunresolved questions as to the uses of a system
confined to one use.Data protection Act maydesigned to infringe upon the populous without the
apply, providing at least some basic rights, (noconsent or knowledge of these people whose
other statutory right in English law to personalfaces are captured. As logs as there are
privacy).Technology can make surveillancesuccessive gove
cheaper through automation a somements, that take control and change policies, the
processes.Freedom is only the perception of beinguses of such tools will also be continually
autonomous.A society can only be consideredchanging.The problems arise when one considers
free where the goverment forces do not havethe wider effects that unwanted surveillance may
absolute power over the generalhave, fore example democracy is in part based
populace.Democracy is in part based on theon the principle that groups can develop views in
principles that groups can develop views ininsolation from goverment.One can extrapolate
insolation from goverment.from historical events such as the development
Summary:The main points made in an article:of Atomic weapons, to save thousands on both
Security system impresses US officials, a specialsides by ending the second would war without
report on the terrorism crisis by Stuart Millarinvading Japan The plans for which were stolen be
published in the Guardian on Tuesday Septemberthe Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, which
25 are summarised as follows:American authoritiesstarted a sequence of events that untimely
are committed to deploying a relatively newended in the current situation where several minor
combination of software and surveillancenation have the ability to start a chain reaction
technologies in response to the attacks ofthat would literary destroy the world.Data
September 11th as part of an airport securityprotection laws:The American people have built
review.The system under consideration, known asinto there laws safeguards that could reasonable
FaceIt, is designed to identify known suspects,be used to help prevent the uncontrolled spread
through comparison of a person's face against aof privative systems. We in direct contrast have
database of facial images, it does not require theno rights built rights to protect the privacy of
cooperation of the subject, and may not eveninformation apart from those set into the data
generate irrefutable evidence in adverseprotection legislation which maybe a futile gesture
conditions, such as those that exist in manyas there are get out glasses for anything evan
airports, which would increase the risk of falseremotely related to law enforcement.Innocent
identifications.This development is being driven byMajority:Should this severance technology be
political interests and could be implemented onimplemented anywhere, the unique situation will be
mass, to form an equivalent to the British ring ofcreated where information will be collected and
steel, supposedly for our safety and protection toprocessed without the individual's knowledge and
help law enforcement track known subjects. Butwill be used without the individual having consent.
once in place it's use will invariably be extendedThe Data protection Act may apply, providing at
over time to infringe upon the populous withoutleast some basic rights, (no other statutory right
our consent or knowledge.The question is that ofin English law to personal privacy exists).Ethical
proportion there must be a balance betweenDilemmas:In a stable society the freedom of the
liberty and control. It should be noted that theindividual can not be absolute, there must be a
current increase in the number of youths waringbalance between liberty and control. It is
hoods is possibly a direct result of the introductionconceivable that there would be no civilised
of CCTV systems.Abstract:The populace of ansociety without a govement able to curtail liberty
informed society would generally resist even theto a reasonable degree. The question is that of
proposal of any potentially repressive technologyproportion technology can be use as a tool for
such as the FaceIt facial recognition system, withcontrol, however over use of such technologies
the capacity to indiscriminately report on theimplies oppression.Any technology can effect a
movements of any subject, especially whensociety in significant ways. Fore example
these technological developments are being drivenincreasingly travail bits of data are collected,
by political interests.However such fears aretransferred precessed and used without the
currently being circumvented by the strongerindividual's knowledge, this is a situation in which
feelings of national insecurity, which are alsopeople can be completely manipulated by
causing fundamental adjustments in politicaltechnology and it has long been the case that
reasoning of the United States authorities whomlegal decisions lag behind technical
are by implication encouraging development ofdevelopments.Conclusions:There is an old Buddhist
technologies previously believed to be technicallyproverb that states "To every man is given the
and socially unjustifiable.The United Stateskey to the gates of heaven; the same key opens
goverment:Is committed to deploying a derivationthe gates of hell". Words of wisdom and of waing
of traditional surveillance technology, in responseas within computerisation lies such a key.The
to a review of airport security in lite of theimplication is that nearly everything has some kind
attacks of September 11th, as a measure to helpof cost to it, new technologies are not created
prevent simular incidents in the future. This mayinstantaneously, so the consequences of such
be a futile gesture as they are looking atnew systems are also not instantaneously
technology to identify known suspects, therealised, if we choose to ignore certain
problem is that this is not very useful as it is thecircumstances in fever of expedient action, in the
unknown terrorists that the authorities need to beend, the full implications will be realised,
conceunfortunately too late.As implied above, the
ed about.Technology:This is a relatively newevents of September 11th are important, these
combination of software and surveillanceevents have almost certainly changed things
technologies, the basic components of the FaceItforever. The question is that of proportion, this is
system under consideration have been about forwhat will determine whether the have won or not.
years, the system is designed to identify knownEspecially when these systems are idolised and
people in public, this could be implemented to formbecome more important then the humans that
an equivalent to the British ring of steel andthey exist to serve, we know from history that
notwithstanding a highly unlikely series of eventsthis sequence of events inevitably fall back upon
resulting in absolute control of this type ofand destroy its makers in the end. Such subject
technology, invariably it will find other uses. Forhave as yet been sadly lacking in our studies
example, marketing research is frequently carriedthus.Technology is intrinsically neutral, how it is
out via the use of surveys. It would be a trivialused determines if it is a force for good or evil, if
matter to use such a powerful security systema technology offers savings to one segment of
to generate statistical data for analysing consumersociety, some cost may be exacted ageist
trends.This technology may be able to captureanother. The Bible will teach us that we are to
and analyse an image of your face, identify youcount the !cost of our commitments. Is there a
from a see of people, read your face and evenprice tag for your soul? Jesus asks the most
infer things from your body language, but theprofound question "What does it profit a man if
context outside the view of the cameras and thehe gains the whole world but loses his own soul in
essence of the moment will be losthell forever" Jesus is asking if we have really
forever.Effectiveness:The efficiency of anythought about costs; spiritual and material. (Jesus
technology is a function of firstly its inherentsaid, Matthew 16:26).As long as we can justify the
advantages over traditional methods and secondlycost in terms of how it allows us it feel safer,
whether its use would solve more problems thanthen we are free because we believe the gove
it would create.Automation of surveillancement is curtailing our liberty to allow a better
operations may reduce part of the administrationquality of life. However, if as a society we accept
required, through effective communications andinvasive methods of protection then we surrender
more centralised control, than is possible witha little more freedom to choose how to five as
human surveillance. The implication being thatwe see fit and not as other would dictate. This
reduction in the time necessary to completeincludes the right to life without others watching
inconsequential tasks (moving paper around)our every move.